Core relational theme

From CasGroup

== Frijda 's form of action readiness == Nico Frijda distinguishes various forms of emotions in terms of distinctly different forms of action readiness (Frijda, 1986). The following table of relational action tendencies contains elementary action tendencies and activation modes which have a particular relational aim (he uses “permitting consummatory activity” instead of proximity) : {| class="wikitable" border="1" |- | | Action tendency | End state | Function | Emotion |- | 1. | Approach | Access | Producing Proximity | Desire |- | 2. | Avoidance | Own inaccessibility | Protection | Fear |- | 3. | Being-with | Contact, interaction | Proximity | Enjoyment, Confidence |- | 4. | Attending (opening) | Identification | Orientation | Interest |- | 5. | Rejecting (closing) | Removal of object | Protection | Disgust |- | 6. | Nonattenting | No information or contact | Selection | Indifference |- | 7. | Agonistic | Removal of obstruction | Regaining control | Anger |- | 8. | Interrupting | Reorientation | Reorientation | Shock, surprise |- | 9. | Dominating | Retained control | Generalized control | Arrogance |- | 10. | Submitting | Deflected pressure | Secondary control | Humility, resignation |- | 11. | Deactivation | - | (Recuperation?) | Sorrow |- | 12. | Bound activation | Action tendency’s end state | Aim achievement | Effort |- | 13. | Excitement | - | Readiness | Excitement |- | 14. | Free activation | - | Generalized readiness | Joy |- | 15. | Inactivity | - | Recuperation | Contentment |- | 16. | Inhibition | Absence of response | Caution | Anxiety |- |17. | Surrender | Activation decrease? | Activation decrease or social cohesion? | (Laughter, weeping) |- |} According to Frijda, ‘approach’ and ‘avoidance’ include all aims which establish and decrease interaction, ‘being-with’ refers to “occasion for sustained interaction – that which is sought in approach and left in avoidance”, and agonistic means active, it is the tendency to remove obstruction. == Lazarus' core relational themes == Richard S. Lazarus, who was Psychology professor at the University of California, Berkeley, explores the relation between emotions and adaptation in detail in his book “Emotion and Adaptation” (Lazarus, 1991) and in a chapter of Pervin’s book “Handbook of Personality” (Smith and Lazarus, 1990). Lazarus distinguishes roughly 15 between distinct emotions for which he identifies ‘core relational themes’. He argues that specific emotions are aroused if an individual perceives a particular person-environment relationship which matches one of several ‘core relational themes’ for itself. The relationship which is encoded in the ‘core relational theme’ are relationships which affect (i.e. support or impair) the well-being and welfare of an individual. In this sense specific emotions are an adaptation to certain reoccuring person-environment encounters, survival relevant conditions and situations of critical importance. This response to a core-relational theme is counteractive if the appraisal is negative, or supportive if it is positive. A core relational theme provides a convenient summary for the relational harm or benefit that underlies each specific kind of emotion. Each emotion or emotion family is defined by a core relational theme. When the implications for individual well-being are appraised by a person, an action impulse, that is consistent with the core relational theme and the emotion that flows from it, is produced. {| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! Emotion ! Core Relational Theme |- | Anger | a demeaning offense against me and mine |- | Anxiety | facing uncertain, existential threat |- | Fright | facing an immediate, concrete, and overwhelming physical danger |- | Guilt | having transgressed a moral imperative |- | Shame | having failed to live up to an ego-ideal |- | Sadness | having experienced an irrevocable loss |- | Envy | wanting what someone else has |- | Jealousy | resenting a third party for loss or threat to another’s affection |- | Disgust | taking in or being too close to an indigestible object or idea |- | Happiness | making reasonable progress toward to realization of a goal |- | Pride | enhancement of one’s ego-identity by taking credit for a valued object or achievement, either our own or that of someone or group with whom we identify |- | Relief | a distressing goal-incongruent condition that has changed for the better or gone away |- | Hope | fearing the worst but yearning for the better |- | Love | desiring or participating in affection, usually but not necessarily reciprocated |- | Compassion | being moved by another’s suffering and wanting to help |- |} He emphasizes negative emotions. They are perhaps a bit more interesting, because their purpose is harder to understand at first than those of positive emotions, who make life worth living. Perhaps they are also more diverse, while there is only one main reason for positive emotions and pleasure – perfect congruence and agreement between goals – there are many forms of disagreement and incongruence. If we consider the opposites for relief, happiness, pain/anxiety, sadness, and disgust one could add the following relational themes: {| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! Emotion ! Core Relational Theme |- | Stress | a distressing goal-incongruent condition has occurred |- | Depression | making no progress at all toward to realization of a goal |- | Pain | impeded action, existence of existential threats |- | Gratitude | having experienced an important assistance |- | Joy | unimpeded action, absence of existential threats |- | Happiness | having experienced an unexpected benefit |- | Appetite or Curiosity | taking in or being close to a digestible object or idea |- |} Lazarus argues further that three basic factors or components are useful to understand the relationship and interdependencies between the various types and forms of emotions: goal relevance, goal congruence, and type of ego-involvement. He prefers to use the term “ego-identity” instead of “self”. == Goal Relevance: Excitement == The first component “goal relevance” is a necessary condition for emotions. He argues that all emotions are only possible if the situation is relevant to the personal goals of the individual. All behavior is motivated by some goal, intention, or drive. Without relevance to personal goals there is no motivation, and without motivation there is no activity. The basic emotion is excitement and arousal, the organism only cares about something if there is some kind of goal relevance for it. Nobody cares if a sack of rice has fallen over in China, but if the sack of rice would belong to you and would be the only thing you have got, you would react with very strong emotions if someone tries to topple or steal it. The rule is simple: if there is goal relevance, then there is excitement. We chose our goals because they prevent harm or generate benefit for us. Therefore “anything that implies harm or benefit to the person can produce an emotion” (Smith and Lazarus, 1990). == Goal Congruence: DO IT, DON’T DO IT == The second component “goal congruence” decides if the excitement is pleasant (positive) or unpleasant (negative), which depends on goal congruence. If there is goal congruence (basically between the current goals of the phenotype and the goals of the genotype), then positive emotions happen. If there is goal incongruence, then negative emotions take place. Primary emotions tell an organism what to do in critical situations. They reward or punish the brain for doing the right or the wrong thing, respectively: * pleasure, joy: do it, genes say GO * distress, pain: don’t do it, genes say NO-GO Already Cicero and Epicurus have noticed this “every animal, as soon as it is born, seeks for pleasure, and delights in it [..], while it recoils from pain [..], and so far as possible avoids it [..] every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. (from “De Finibus, Bonorum et Malorum”, written by Marcus Tullius Cicero in the first century)” Negative emotions have a protective function, they prevent and impede actions which would lead to harm or damage. Positive emotions have a supportive function, they encourage actions that lead to achievement of goals which are in agreement with the goals of the genes. They help an organism in making progress toward the realization of its goals. Positive emotions are an adaptation to favorable person-environment relationships, negative emotions are an adaptation to unfavorable ones. The former allow the organism to exploit favorable situations, while the latter urge to avoid unfavorable ones. Genes give their GO or green light for everything which is in agreement with their primary goals and their basic policies: self-maintenance (which implies survival and growth) and self-reproduction. == Goal Congruence: expect x, pursue/seek x, follow x, avoid x == Secondary emotions tell an organism how to behave in complex environments. “Do it” and “Don’t do it” commands are broken down into various cases of dangerous things that should be avoided or pursued: * Disgust/Distaste – do not take in indigestible objects, don’t eat x (prevent internal harm and poisoning) * Fear/Anxiety – do not come close to dangerous objects, keep away from x (prevent external physical harm) * Appetite/Taste – take in digestible objects, eat x * Interest/Hope – come close to beneficial objects, pursue x, sustain commitment to x Stress and relief select the right level of readiness for action in general. Stress is useful for preparation, relief for recuperation: * Excitement/Stress – prepare for x, expect x, preparation * Contentment/Relief – relax, don’t expect x, recuperation While love, hope and happiness serve to engage in promising commitments with good future expectancy, sadness serves to disengage from lost commitments with bad future expectancy (Smith and Lazarus, 1990). In arises in situations where someone experiences an irrevocable loss. * Love/Happiness : congruence between own goals and goals of other person, meet x, follow x, engage with x, keep close to x, make progress toward the realization of a goal * Hate : incongruence between own goals and goals of group member,expel x, break relationship with x * Depression/Sadness – disengage from x, break commitment to x, prevent pursuit of unachievable goals, get help and support from group == Ego-Involvement: x does y to z == Complex emotions have a social component or some form of ego-involvement, they include anger, embarrassment, guilt, pride, shame. They have strong influences and consequences on the physical health and the well-being of the individual in the group. Which emotion is created by which social actions and behavior patterns depends on various factors, accountability (where is the source? who is to blame? who is accountable for it?) and effect (where is the target/victim? who is injured or damaged by it?) '''Anger''' arises if there are obstacles. This obstacles can be social, too, for instance if important personal goals are being threatened by unfair social behavior (which is often not directly visible or hidden), and the affected person tends to blame someone else for this offense. It expresses the belief that you should be treated better and someone else is to blame for the offense against yourself. Therefore it serves to bring unfair social behavior to light, to eliminate socially demeaning offenses, and to eliminate harm which can be blamed on someone else. Anger tries to reveal a hidden fact, if x has secretly done y to me, anger tries to reveal y to the public. '''Shame''' is the reaction if something embarrassing has been revealed to the public. It indicates someone has revealed an embarrassing, previously hidden fact: x have done y, and someone else, say z, has made it public. While pride expresses belief that yourself should be praised for good social behavior, because you have done better than expected or required, guilt and shame are the opposite, they express the belief that yourself should not be praised for your own social behavior. If the victim is someone else, guilt arises, if the target is yourself, shame and embarrassment appear. The high diversity of individual emotions, both negative and positive, help the organism to respond quickly to various threats and opportunities. If an organism has a variety of differentiated emotions, it has the adaptive advantage of protection from various sources of harm and danger (fear and anxiety protect from dangerous predators, disgust protects from the risk of poisoning and infectious disease, pain protects from damaging the physical integrity, sadness motivates us to seek aid and comfort while coming to terms with out loss, depression protects from pursuing unachievable goals, stress protects in threatening situations with high risk of severe attacks). It also benefits from the support of “advisers” and “consultants” who optimize progress toward basic goal achievement (joy and pride encourage sustained commitment to beneficial goals, relief saves energy and resources, attraction to food and mates secures self-maintenance, self-conservation and self-reproduction, ..). Emotions are an adaptation of animals to fast changing and challenging contingencies in their environment. The environment of an animal can change suddenly from peaceful and friendly to hostile and harmful. For social animals, especially humans and primates, the environment consists mainly of other animals, which can interact in various ways. In this context it is beneficial when certain agent-environment relationships, constellations and situations trigger instantly certain states of mind, which are characterized by a certain type of action readiness, urge or impulse to do something. Emotions influence strongly how agent and environment interact with each other. In this sense, they characterize different relationship changes between the goals of an agent and the environment. The various types and forms of emotions can be understood in terms of goal relevance, goal congruence, and type of ego-involvement. == Links == * Wikipedia Link for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_relational_theme Core relational theme] * CAS Group Blog entry for [http://blog.cas-group.net/2010/04/emotions-as-adaptation/ Emotions as adaptation] == Bibliography == * Nico H. Frijda, The Emotions, Cambridge University Press, 1986 * Richard S. Lazarus, Emotion and Adaptation, Oxford University Press, 1991 * Craig A. Smith and Richard S. Lazarus, “Emotion and Adaptation” in Lawrence A. Pervin (Ed.),“Handbook of Personality”, The Guilford Press, 1990 [[Category:Complex Systems]] [[Category:Adaptive Systems]] [[Category:Psychology]]

Return to Core relational theme.