Jfromm at 22:45, 25 March 2011

2011-03-25T22:45:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 25 March 2011
Line 50:		Line 50:
	* [[Consciousness]]		* [[Consciousness]]
	* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]		* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]
	* [[Ambient Intelligence]]
	* [[Mission-critical]]
	* [[Self-Organization]]		* [[Self-Organization]]
	* [[Web 2.0]]		* [[Web 2.0]]

Jfromm at 22:44, 25 March 2011

2011-03-25T22:44:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 25 March 2011
Line 45:		Line 45:
	distributed and complex systems are:		distributed and complex systems are:

	* [[Ajax]]
	* [[Agent]]		* [[Agent]]
	* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]
	* [[Autonomic Computing]]		* [[Autonomic Computing]]
	* [[Cloud Computing]]		* [[Cloud Computing]]
			* [[Consciousness]]
			* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]
	* [[Ambient Intelligence]]		* [[Ambient Intelligence]]
	* [[Mission-critical]]		* [[Mission-critical]]

Jfromm at 21:05, 15 December 2008

2008-12-15T21:05:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 15 December 2008
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]		* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]
	* [[Autonomic Computing]]		* [[Autonomic Computing]]
			* [[Cloud Computing]]
	* [[Ambient Intelligence]]		* [[Ambient Intelligence]]
	* [[Mission-critical]]		* [[Mission-critical]]

Jfromm at 10:10, 4 October 2008

2008-10-04T10:10:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 4 October 2008
Line 32:		Line 32:
	The attempt to clarify buzzwords and the attempt to define them clearly can lead to		The attempt to clarify buzzwords and the attempt to define them clearly can lead to
	a kind of "schism" in a community. The word schism means a division or a		a kind of "schism" in a community. The word schism means a division or a
	split~~, see [[Agent_schism\|agent schism]]~~.		split.

	Thus buzzwords have their assets and drawbacks, on the one hand they are powerful tools to		Thus buzzwords have their assets and drawbacks, on the one hand they are powerful tools to

Jfromm: New page: A '''buzzword''' or catchphrase expresses a broad, fuzzy and general concept which is very popular. A term, principle or concept is a buzzword if it is very popular although it is unclear...

2008-10-04T10:10:22Z

New page: A '''buzzword''' or catchphrase expresses a broad, fuzzy and general concept which is very popular. A term, principle or concept is a buzzword if it is very popular although it is unclear...

New page

A '''buzzword''' or catchphrase expresses a broad, fuzzy and general
concept which is very popular. A term, principle or concept is a buzzword
if it is very popular although it is unclear what it means. There is typically
no strict agreement on exactly what the term means. A buzzword has usually
a wide range of meanings, within many different contexts it means
quite different things. Nearly all systems for instance can be
considered as complex, organized, distributed or adaptive and
the real question is to what extent or degree. This is an advantage
of buzzwords (one can cover a lot of different phenomena and systems
with only one word), but also a potential pitfall (since one may mean
a certain system, while another means a completely different system).
Therefore every buzzword should be treated with care. The popularity of
such a word is sometimes based on positive [[Feedback|feedback]]:
often it is a general word or phrase that is used because
it is important and popular, and it is both important and popular
because others use it frequently. It takes on added significance
through repetition or usage.

Buzzwords are typically terms that resist a clear, narrow and precise definition,
a trait they have in common which abstract words as 'life' and 'intelligence'.
There are either too few or too many formal treatments, and compact formal definitions
which are suitable, meaningful and useful are rare. Because buzzwords are hard to
define, they are also hard to measure. Many terms like [[Complexity|complexity]]
and [[Self-Organization|self-organization]] are indeed notoriously difficult to
define and to measure, although everyone seems to know roughly what they mean
in general ("I know it when I see it"): something is complex if it is difficult
to describe, and something organizes itself if no external organizer does it.
Yet the attempt to pin them down formally or mathematically leads to great
difficulties. Even if a formal definition is possible,
without generality it is difficult to apply them to practical situations, because
one or more of the underlying assumptions will often fail to be satisfied.
The attempt to clarify buzzwords and the attempt to define them clearly can lead to
a kind of "schism" in a community. The word schism means a division or a
split, see [[Agent_schism|agent schism]].

Thus buzzwords have their assets and drawbacks, on the one hand they are powerful tools to
get funding, to write successful project proposals, to get things published, to capture attention,
to impress people, etc., because if one pretends to solve problems associated with them, one
pretends automatically to solve a wide range of problems due to their inherent wide range of meanings.
On the other hand they should be treated with care (because they might lead to
mathematical quagmire, confusion, misunderstandings, illusions, contradictions, schisms
in communities, etc.)

Examples for popular buzzwords in the field of
distributed and complex systems are:

* [[Ajax]]
* [[Agent]]
* [[Ubiquitous Computing]]
* [[Autonomic Computing]]
* [[Ambient Intelligence]]
* [[Mission-critical]]
* [[Self-Organization]]
* [[Web 2.0]]
* [[Web Services]]
* [[Service-Oriented Architecture]]
* [[Loose Coupling]]
* [[Complexity]]
* [[Non-linear System|Non-Linearity]]
* [[Non-linear System|Non-Equilibrium]]

Buzzwords are often created by negations
which describe the opposite of simple things.
Something is complex if it is not simple,
something is self-organizing if it is not organized by someone else,
something is asynchronous if it is not synchronous, etc:

* [[Complexity]] is the opposite of simplicity
* [[Non-linear System|Non-Linearity]] is the opposite of linearity
* "Asynchrony" is the opposite synchrony
* [[Non-linear System|Non-Equilibrium]] is the opposite of equilibrium

The phrases are of course vague, ambiguous and broad, they
are like calling Zoology the 'study
of nonelephant animals.' It is maybe true, but it
does not say what kind of "nonelephant animals"
exactly. A popular phrase in early theories of
[[Self-Organization|self-organization]] was for example
"systems far from equilibrium". This phrase is not
very helpful, because it does not say how far, or
in which direction at all. It only replaces one
buzzword with another.
There are many nonlinear, non-equilibrium,
asynchronous and complex systems, but only
a few linear, equilibrium, synchronous and simple
systems: simplicity has a unified form, but
[[Complexity|complexity]] has many varieties.

Buzzword - Revision history

Jfromm at 22:45, 25 March 2011

Jfromm at 22:44, 25 March 2011

Jfromm at 21:05, 15 December 2008

Jfromm at 10:10, 4 October 2008

Jfromm: New page: A '''buzzword''' or catchphrase expresses a broad, fuzzy and general concept which is very popular. A term, principle or concept is a buzzword if it is very popular although it is unclear...