Agent-Based Model

From CasGroup

Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Eboxytezi (Talk) to last version by Jfromm)
Line 112: Line 112:
* Axelrod and Bennett's (1993) model of competing bimodal coalitions
* Axelrod and Bennett's (1993) model of competing bimodal coalitions
* Joyce et al.'s (2006) model of conditional association
* Joyce et al.'s (2006) model of conditional association
 +
 +
== Models and Plays ==
 +
 +
Can agent based models and traditional plays
 +
(for example Shakespeare's plays) be considered as two
 +
extremes on one scale? In both we witness the outcome of a
 +
small number of agents or actors interacting
 +
with each other in a particular environment
 +
according to certain rules and intentions.
 +
Shakespeares' plays are basic "models" for the
 +
complexity which arises through "love in hate"
 +
(Romeo and Juliet), "hesitation in action" (Hamlet)
 +
or "striving against destiny" (Macbeth). In
 +
Shakespeares' words "Though this be madness,
 +
yet there is method in't."
 +
 +
Can plays be considered as a kind of model for systems
 +
with complex BDI agents and abstract rules?
 +
If a developer programs an object-oriented system,
 +
he determines in detail what every object should do,
 +
step by step, in every possible situation.
 +
What happens if we write advanced programs for agent-
 +
oriented systems, would they look like plays from
 +
a playwright? Or would we have to program
 +
beliefs, desires, emotions and intentions?
 +
 +
In plays, the actors are driven by basic emotions
 +
and intentions. One theme is "love in hate" or
 +
"desire in vengeance" which appears in "Romeo and
 +
Juliet". Among others, the "desire in vengeance"
 +
theme can also be found in Hamlet: Ophelia and
 +
Hamlet love each other, but Hamlet kills her
 +
father accidentally, she kills herself, then her
 +
brother Laertes takes revenge, and in the end
 +
they are all dead.
 +
 +
The playwright usually describes one of many
 +
possible plots or outcomes for a certain theme,
 +
here for instance what could happen if love and
 +
hate collide. The basic motives are as simple as
 +
the rules in basic ABMs. This is why I said
 +
that ABMs and plays can be considered as two
 +
extremes on one scale:
 +
 +
ABMs:
 +
* simple agents, driven by basic rules
 +
* outcome (the sequence of actions) is not determined
 +
 +
Plays:
 +
* complex actors, driven by basic emotions and intentions
 +
* outcome (the sequence of actions) is determined
 +
== Literature ==
== Literature ==

Revision as of 22:41, 16 February 2011

Personal tools