Robustness
From CasGroup
(New page: '''Robustness''' in the context of software systems and applications is defined as the degree to which a system or component can still function in the presence of pertubations:...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ::::People err. That is a fact of life. People are not precision machinery designed for accuracy | ||
| + | ::::In fact, we humans are a different kind of device entirely. Creativity, adaptability, and | ||
| + | ::::flexibility are our strengths. Continual alertness and precision in action or memory are our | ||
| + | ::::weaknesses. We are amazingly error tolerant, even when physically damaged. We are extremely | ||
| + | ::::flexible, robust, creative, and superb at finding explanations and meanings from partial and | ||
| + | ::::noisy evidence. The same properties that lead to such robustness and creativity also produce | ||
| + | ::::errors. The natural tendency to interpret partial information -- although often our prime virtue | ||
| + | :::: -- can cause operators to misinterpret system behavior in such a plausible way that the | ||
| + | ::::misinterpretation can be difficult to discover. - Donald A. Norman | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
'''Robustness''' in the context of software systems and applications is defined as the degree | '''Robustness''' in the context of software systems and applications is defined as the degree | ||
to which a [[System|system]] or component can still function in the presence of pertubations: | to which a [[System|system]] or component can still function in the presence of pertubations: | ||
